Blood Sugar Testing: Rethinking the Norms with Functional Medicine

For most people, changes in blood sugar levels probably aren’t top of mind, but health trends in the U.S. suggest that they should be. Nearly 1 in 3 people are considered pre-diabetic, and 80% of those people are totally unaware of a looming chronic illness. Blood sugar levels tend to become dysregulated with age, and as a result of a Westernized diet, and sedentary lifestyle. Because of these changes, it's crucial to have a reliable way to test blood sugar levels so you and your doctor can stay ahead of any health issues. Maintaining healthy blood sugar levels is crucial to prevent chronic diseases like diabetes, heart disease, and obesity.

In this blog, we'll discuss how to effectively test your blood sugar levels and provide recommendations to help you maintain healthy levels as you age! We'll also share how the traditional markers, advocated by conventional medicine, may not be the best indicators of your blood sugar health.

Learn more about conditions we treat: Diabetes

Testing Your Blood Sugar Levels

When it comes to testing your blood sugar levels, there are several methods to choose from. One of the most common testing methods is HbA1c. It is a blood test that measures sugars that are "stuck" to proteins in red blood cells (called glycosylated hemoglobin). This indicates your average blood sugar levels over the past three months.

While the test is generally reliable, it is not always the most accurate marker of blood sugar levels. Other tests like fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, and continuous glucose monitoring also track your blood sugar level at a specific time.

In the realm of holistic medicine, where a proactive approach to health is paramount, the way we assess blood sugar levels may differ from conventional medicine. To understand why our approach stands apart, we must first unravel the story of blood sugar measurement, its evolving norms, and why certain tests might not truly represent your health.

The Three Ways Blood Sugar Is Usually Measured

Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)

This is the most common marker used in clinical settings. It measures glucose concentration in the blood after an 8-12 hour fast.

However, it only reflects how blood sugar behaves in a fasting state, offering limited insights into post-meal glucose responses, and how they change over time.

The Conventional Norms: Up until 1998, an FBG level above 140 mg/dL was considered diabetic. This threshold was later lowered to 126 mg/dL. A "normal" blood sugar range is typically set at 99 mg/dL (1).

Learn about becoming a new patient

Schedule a free 15 minute consultation

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

The OGTT assesses first and second-stage insulin responses to glucose. It involves fasting and then consuming a 75-gram glucose solution. Blood sugar is tested one and two hours later.

If your blood sugar exceeds 140 mg/dL after two hours, you’re classified as pre-diabetic; if it exceeds 199 mg/dL, you have diabetes.

The Quandary: These numerical cutoffs may seem arbitrary, with one point below the pre-diabetic limit deeming you “normal.” In reality, diabetes is a process with incremental changes, emphasizing the importance of early intervention.

Artificial Nature: Additionally, the OGTT employs an artificial, high-glucose solution that doesn’t resemble real-life dietary choices.

Hemoglobin A1c (A1c)

A1c measures how glucose bonds to hemoglobin in red blood cells, indicating average blood sugar over the past three months.

The standard “normal” range is between 4% and 6%, with 5.7% often being the cutoff.

The A1c Caveat: While A1c has gained popularity due to its cost-effectiveness, it’s not foolproof. It can be skewed by conditions such as anemia, leading to falsely low A1c levels. Dehydration can produce falsely high A1c results (2).

Read: The 9 Best Preventative Screenings Before Turning 40

The Flaws in Traditional Blood Sugar Measures

The conventional norms for these blood sugar markers have faced criticism within the functional and integrative medicine community.

Here’s why:

Questionable Thresholds: The cutoff values for diabetes and pre-diabetes have evolved over the years, leading to debates about when to intervene. Early intervention, particularly in the pre-diabetic stage, is often deemed more effective by functional medicine. While elevated blood sugar levels may be considered common, they are not necessarily normal.
The OGTT Dilemma: The OGTT is criticized for its artificial nature and the abrupt blood sugar swings it induces, making it an inadequate representation of real-life glucose responses to food.
A1c Inaccuracy: The A1c test’s reliance on hemoglobin levels makes it vulnerable to conditions like anemia, dehydration, and how long blood cells live in different people, leading to potential misinterpretations of blood sugar status (3).

Why HbA1c is Not Always A Reliable Marker of Blood Sugar Levels

While HbA1c is a popular blood sugar level test, it has its limitations. The test can be influenced by several factors such as age, anemia, hemoglobin abnormalities, kidney dysfunction, and thyroid disorders (4).

Results from the HbA1c test are also based on the assumption that red blood cells live for an average of 3 months or 120 days in the body. However, blood cells can live for a range of time in different people—anywhere from 81 days in diabetics, to as long as 146 days in people without diabetes (5). This study also found that, on average, red blood cell life span decreased by about 7 days for every 1.0% increase in glycosylated hemoglobin (red blood cells with glucose stuck to them).

This means that hemoglobin could have a longer lifespan in people with normal blood sugar, giving it more time to accumulate sugar and then artificially increase the A1c result.

HbA1c also doesn’t indicate the daily fluctuations in blood sugar levels within a day or the timing of high glucose levels. It’s for these reasons that functional medicine practitioners recommend other biomarker tests such as fasting and post-prandial glucose and continuous glucose monitoring to track blood sugar fluctuations better.

Recommendations According to Functional Medicine

Functional medicine emphasizes the importance of maintaining healthy blood sugar levels to promote overall health and longevity.

One recommendation is following a healthy diet consisting of low-glycemic-index foods. These foods are low in sugar, starch, and carbohydrates which lead to a gradual increase in blood sugar levels. Functional medicine also recommends increasing fiber intake to moderate glucose levels and improve insulin sensitivity.

Physical activity, stress-management techniques, and supplements like magnesium or chromium are also helpful in maintaining healthy blood sugar levels.

In the holistic health model, we emphasize personalized assessments, considering not just one but a range of markers to evaluate your blood sugar health.

We recommend more comprehensive panels that may go beyond fasting blood glucose and A1c. This allows for a more individualized approach to maintaining healthy blood sugar levels.

To Wrap It Up

The common norms in blood sugar measurement, while widely accepted, have their flaws. The emphasis in functional medicine is on early intervention, personalization, and the recognition that “common” doesn’t always equate to “normal.” By considering additional markers and employing a proactive approach to blood sugar management, we aim to help individuals maintain their health and well-being more effectively.

Schedule a visit online or speak with a patient care coordinator now!

If you’re looking to take a more proactive approach to your blood sugar health, consider consulting a functional medicine practitioner at CentreSpringMD who can provide a more comprehensive assessment and personalized recommendations based on your unique needs.